Javascript Question posted in
A very good W3school tutorial can be found here.

Javascript – How to gracefully handle missing user data in React without revealing backend issues?

I’m building a microservices-based application and in the front-end I’m using React and TypeScript. In one of the services, I fetch post data to display to users. Each post has a user field containing details about the user who created the post. However, if the user service is down, the user field in the response is null.

Here’s an example of the response when the user service is unavailable:

{
  "id": 1,
  "content": "Sample post content",
  "user": null
}

In such cases, I want to display the post without revealing to the user that there’s an issue (like the user service being down). For example, I might display something like "Anonymous" in place of the user’s name. However, I want to avoid explicitly using if-else or ternary operations to handle the null value.

I’ve Tried Using optional chaining, but it still requires me to provide fallback logic like user?.name || "Anonymous" also I’ve Tried Wrapping the logic in a function, but it feels repetitive across components.

What’s the best way to cleanly handle such scenarios in React, ensuring maintainability and avoiding repetitive conditional logic throughout the codebase?

Tags:

2

Answers


  1. 0

    How about defining a function to fetch your user to always resolve to a User?

    Something like:

    interface User {
  name: string
}

export const fetchUser = async (): Promise<User> => {
  try {
    const response = await fetch('api.com/user')
    return (await reponse.json()) as User;
  } catch (error) {
    return { name: 'Anonymous' }
  }
}

    Keep in mind that request failures can still be visible in the network tab of the developer console.

    Login or Signup to reply.
  2. 0

    To handle the scenario where the user field might be null in a clean and maintainable way across your React components, you can use a utility function combined with TypeScript’s type system and context-specific solutions. Here’s how you can structure your approach:

    1. Utility Function for Safe Access

    Create a utility function to safely access user.name with a fallback:

    // utils/getUserName.ts
export const getUserName = (user: { name?: string } | null, fallback: string = "Anonymous"): string => {
  return user?.name ?? fallback;
};

    This function encapsulates the fallback logic, and you can reuse it wherever needed, reducing repetitive conditional checks.

    2. TypeScript Type Enhancements

    Define a TypeScript type for your post to clarify the structure:

    // types/Post.ts
export interface Post {
  id: number;
  content: string;
  user: { name: string } | null;
}

    This ensures that user can be explicitly typed as null or contain the expected structure.

    3. Usage in Components

    Use the utility function in your components for concise and readable logic:

    import React from "react";
import { getUserName } from "../utils/getUserName";
import { Post } from "../types/Post";

interface PostProps {
  post: Post;
}

const PostComponent: React.FC<PostProps> = ({ post }) => {
  const userName = getUserName(post.user);

  return (
    <div className="post">
      <h3>{userName}</h3>
      <p>{post.content}</p>
    </div>
  );
};

export default PostComponent;

    4. Optional: Higher-Order Component (HOC)

    If multiple components need to handle similar logic, you can create a Higher-Order Component (HOC):

    import React from "react";
import { getUserName } from "../utils/getUserName";
import { Post } from "../types/Post";

export const withUserFallback = (Component: React.ComponentType<{ post: Post }>) => {
  return (props: { post: Post }) => {
    const postWithFallback = {
      ...props.post,
      user: { name: getUserName(props.post.user) },
    };
    return <Component {...props} post={postWithFallback} />;
  };
};

    Usage:

    const PostWithFallback = withUserFallback(PostComponent);

// In your render
<PostWithFallback post={post} />

    5. Context or Custom Hook

    If the fallback logic is central to your application, consider using a React Context or a custom hook to manage user-related fallback logic globally.

    Custom Hook Example:

    import { useCallback } from "react";

export const useUserFallback = () => {
  return useCallback((user: { name?: string } | null, fallback: string = "Anonymous") => {
    return user?.name ?? fallback;
  }, []);
};

    Usage:

    const PostComponent: React.FC<PostProps> = ({ post }) => {
  const getUserName = useUserFallback();
  const userName = getUserName(post.user);

  return (
    <div className="post">
      <h3>{userName}</h3>
      <p>{post.content}</p>
    </div>
  );
};

    6. Localization Support (Optional)

    If you want flexibility for multilingual fallback values, integrate a localization library like i18next:

    import { useTranslation } from "react-i18next";

const getUserName = (user: { name?: string } | null, fallbackKey: string): string => {
  const { t } = useTranslation();
  return user?.name || t(fallbackKey);
};

    This ensures future-proofing for internationalized applications.

    Summary

    • Use a utility function (getUserName) for reusable fallback logic.
    • Enhance type safety with a clear Post interface.
    • Use an HOC or a custom hook for components needing shared logic.
    • Optionally integrate localization for multilingual support.

    This approach keeps your code DRY, readable, and maintainable across the application.

    Login or Signup to reply.
Please signup or login to give your own answer.

Back To Top
Search