I am trying to compile .c file in VS Code terminals, but when executing gcc test.c -o test.exe the VS Code external terminal will yield this error: Assembler messages: Fatal error: can't create C:Users However, executing the above code in…
When compiling this code #include <math.h> double *y0; int main() { return 0; } with gcc 13.2.0 from latest debian-sid, I get the following error: gcc -o a.out proof.c -Wall -lm proof.c:3:9: error: 'y0' redeclared as different kind of symbol…
I know this is impossible because I've spent hours on it and also read these below but I am determined to approximate a clang block forward definition even if it takes linker tricks or inline assembly: I did my homework…
I have an executable compiled on a latest operating system. The executable is just a few lines of math code. Problem is, it's crashing when it's running on a different system. ImportError: /lib64/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by /path/to/mylib.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)…
My environment: Linux My-PC 5.15.90.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS GDB-multiarch version $ gdb-multiarch -v GNU gdb (Ubuntu 12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04) 12.1 Selected part of Makefile (Many things are ignored): AS =arm-linux-gnueabihf-as LD =arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld NM =arm-linux-gnueabihf-nm…
I have a class (struct) that contains a static const std::array private member. I want this member to be static and constant (non-writable). It looks like as if adding the initialization through static function, breaks the constness of the member…
Sometime in the gcc 4.5 era, a warning for the following expression was introduced and subsequently fixed apparently the development of the 10.x versions, i.e. newer compilers do no longer produce the warning. The expression producing the warning immediately precedes…
Under gcc 11.3.0, when entering the command, gcc -M -MD sourcefile.c, a file named "a-sourcefile.d" is created. However, under gcc 9.4.0, the "a-" prefix is not present. Is this correct behavour? I was expecting .d files without the "a-" prefix.…
This is my simple program #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]){ printf("%dn", argc); for(int i=1; i<argc; i++) printf("%sn", argv[i]); return 0; } If I compile with terminal and run gcc -o test test.c ./test foo bar I get 3…
I was working on a personal project and I made this kind of code (in a static little helper function) : char *tmp = NULL; if ((tmp = strchr(mode, 'b') != NULL) && tmp - mode < 3) return BINARY_MODE;…