In an interview, I was asked the question as described in the title. I think the interviewer wanted to ask about the underlying principles of property accessors in js. So what I want to know is the perfemance and principles instead of difference.
Bracket Notation
const a = { b: { c: 'Bracket Notation' } }
console.log(a['b']['c'])
Dot Notation
const a = { b: { c: 'Dot Notation' } }
console.log(a.b.c)
2
Answers
One of the key differences between dot notation and bracket notation is in their ability to access dynamically generated properties.
The dynamic property access capability is a significant advantage of bracket notation and is essential when you need to compute the property name at runtime. It allows you to access properties that you couldn’t access using dot notation, such as properties with spaces or special characters, or properties whose names are stored in variables.
Performance-wise, there used to be a minor difference between the two in older JavaScript engines, with dot notation being slightly faster. However, modern JavaScript engines have optimized both notations to a point where the difference is negligible.
Dot Notation:
Dot notation is more concise and easier to read.
It is the preferred way to access properties when you know the property name in advance.
Dot notation is generally faster because it’s more optimized by JavaScript engines.
Bracket Notation:
Bracket notation is more flexible because it allows you to access properties using dynamic property names or properties with spaces or special characters.
It is used when the property name is not known in advance and is stored in a variable.
In terms of performance, dot notation is generally faster because it’s optimized by JavaScript engines. However, the difference in performance is often negligible in most real-world scenarios, and you should prioritize code clarity and readability over micro-optimizations.