I want to serialize a list of objects using jsonpickle
. Each of these objects contains a list of objects within them:
class ImageManipulationConfiguration:
region_list = []
def to_json(self):
return jsonpickle.encode(self.region_list, indent=4,
separators=(',', ': '))
here, region_list
contains objects of this class:
class ImageManipulationRegion:
image_manipulation_element_list = []
Inside image_manipulation_element_list
, there are objects of class inheriting this class:
class ImageManipulationElement
When I call my to_json
function, only the top level items in the region_list
are serialized, the sub object within the image_manipulation_element_list
lists are not included. Is there a way to recursively include everything using jsonpickle
?
5
Answers
you can use the
unpicklable
parameter in jsonpickle to recursively include all objects. Set theunpicklable
parameter toTrue
when callingjsonpickle.encode
to include all objects, even those that are not directly referenced by the top-level object.hre’s how you can modify your
to_json
method:this should include all objects within
region_list
, including the sub-objects withinimage_manipulation_element_list
.Yes, you can achieve recursive serialization of objects using jsonpickle by customizing the serialization process for each of your classes. To do this, you’ll need to define a custom handler for each class that specifies how to serialize its instances and their nested objects.
Here’s how you can achieve this for your classes:
Define custom handlers for each class:
Now, when you call to_json on an instance of ImageManipulationConfiguration, it will include the custom serialization logic for each class:
By providing custom serialization logic for each class, you can make sure that nested objects are properly serialized when you call to_json. This allows you to achieve recursive serialization with jsonpickle.
Answer :-
Use
max_depth=4
And change separaters
Lile below.
jsonpickle can recurse complex, nested objects and serialize them. But in order for jsonpickle to output the complete hierarchy of the object serialization, these objects must be instance variables and not class variables. Your current configuration shares the class variables of region_list and image_manipulation_element_list between all the instances of the class. They should be converted to instance variables.
modified version of your classes that will allow jsonpickle to serialize data properly.
Yes, you can use the jsonpickle.set_encoder_options function to set the indent and separators parameters for all future encodes.
This will output:
The sub-objects within image_manipulation_element_list are now included in the encoded JSON.