skip to Main Content

I’m working with PostgreSQL and using pg_export_snapshot() to create a snapshot in one transaction, which I then import into another transaction using SET TRANSACTION SNAPSHOT. I noticed that PostgreSQL requires the original (exporting) transaction to stay active while the snapshot is being used by the importing transaction.

Could someone explain why the exporting transaction must remain open for the snapshot to be valid in the importing transaction? Specifically, what is the technical reason behind this requirement?

Any insights into how PostgreSQL handles snapshot consistency in this context would be helpful. Thank you!

2

Answers


  1. In PostgreSQL, the exporting transaction must stay open to keep the snapshot valid when it’s imported into another transaction. This is because the snapshot "freezes" a view of which transactions were committed at that specific moment. PostgreSQL needs the exporting transaction to remain active to keep that view stable and prevent any inconsistencies. If the exporting transaction were to close, PostgreSQL might clean up the transaction IDs it used, which would make the snapshot unusable or unreliable. When the exporting transaction is closed, other transactions are free to modify the data, and this can change what the snapshot would show, leading to data drift and inconsistencies. Keeping the transaction open acts like a steady "anchor" that prevents any unexpected changes in what data the importing transaction sees. So, PostgreSQL requires the exporting transaction to stay open to maintain a stable, reliable view of data across transactions.

    Login or Signup to reply.
  2. If a snapshot exists, PostgreSQL needs to know about that so that VACUUM won’t clean up any data that would be visible in that snapshot.

    For that, PostgreSQL uses the information you can see as backend_xmin in the pg_stat_activity view. If you were to close the transaction, that information would become invalid, and VACUUM might clean up data before you import the snapshot somewhere else.

    Sure, it would be possible to have something in shared memory that tracks the xmin horizon of exported snapshots, but (apart from not holding any locks) that would have the same effect as you holding open the transaction. Moreover, you’d have to somehow expire snapshots that never get imported anywhere. So that does not seem like a good idea.

    Login or Signup to reply.
Please signup or login to give your own answer.
Back To Top
Search