I have a blog with Photoshop tutorials and because some of my tutorials are quite long I’ve decided to split the content into parts
http://www.psd-dude.com/tutorials/how-to-make-a-coffee-stain-text-in-photoshop.aspx
http://www.psd-dude.com/tutorials/how-to-make-a-coffee-stain-text-in-photoshop.aspx?part=2
and set the canonical
rel for both pages to
http://www.psd-dude.com/tutorials/how-to-make-a-coffee-stain-text-in-photoshop.aspx
Is this better than the option of having 2 canonical links? Please note that I have images and text on both parts that I would like to have indexed.
2
Answers
It’s not allowed to use the
canonical
link type in that case.RFC 6596 defines:
But your second page is not included in (or identical to) the first page.
So you have these options:
canonical
target for all paginated pages (but if you do this, you might want to consider to stop offering the paginated versions in the first place). Note that this is only allowed if the paginated pages don’t have separate user comments (or any other unique content).canonical
targets.canonical
.You can use canonical for pagination for solve that:
In the
<head>
section of the first page (www.psd-dude.com/tutorials/how-to-make-a-coffee-stain-text-in-photoshop.aspx),add a link tag pointing to the next page in the sequence, like this:
Because this is the first URL in the sequence, there’s no need to add markup for rel=”prev”.
On the second and third pages, add links pointing to the previous and next URLs in the sequence. For example, you could add the following to the second page of the sequence:
On the final page of the sequence (www.psd-dude.com/tutorials/how-to-make-a-coffee-stain-text-in-photoshop.aspx?part=4>), add a link pointing to the previous URL, like this:
Because this is the final URL in the sequence, there’s no need to add a rel=”next” link.