How to reproduce Photoshop's multiply blending in OpenCV?

joelg
September 19, 2015
170 views
1 vote
2 Answers

I’m trying to reproduce Photoshop’s multiply blend mode in OpenCV. Equivalents to this would be what you find in GIMP, or when you use the CIMultiplyBlendMode in Apple’s CoreImage framework.

Everything I read online suggests that multiply blending is accomplished simply by multiplying the channels of the two input images (i.e., Blend = AxB). And, this works, except for the case(s) where alpha is < 1.0.

You can test this very simply in GIMP/PhotoShop/CoreImage by creating two layers/images, filling each with a different solid color, and then modifying the opacity of the first layer. (BTW, when you modify alpha, the operation is no longer commutative in GIMP for some reason.)

A simple example: if A = (0,0,0,0) and B = (0.4,0,0,1.0), and C = AxB, then I would expect C to be (0,0,0,0). This is simple multiplication. But this is not how this blend is implemented in practice. In practice, C = (0.4,0,0,1.0), or C = B.

The bottom line is this: I need to figure out the formula for the multiply blend mode (which is clearly more than AxB) and then implement it in OpenCV (which should be trivial once I have the formula).

Would appreciate any insights.

Also, for reference, here are some links which show multiply blend as being simply AxB:

How does photoshop blend two images together

Wikipedia – Blend Modes

Photoshop Blend Modes

Answers

Chosen as BEST ANSWER

I managed to sort this out. Feel free to comment with any suggested improvements.

First, I found a clue as to how to implement the multiply function in this post:

multiply blending

And here's a quick OpenCV implementation in C++.

Mat MultiplyBlend(const Mat& cvSource, const Mat& cvBackground) {

// assumption: cvSource and cvBackground are of type CV_8UC4

// formula: (cvSource.rgb * cvBackground.rgb * cvSource.a) + (cvBackground.rgb * (1-cvSource.a))
Mat cvAlpha(cvSource.size(), CV_8UC3, Scalar::all(0));
Mat input[] = { cvSource };
int from_to[] = { 3,0, 3,1, 3,2 };
mixChannels(input, 1, &cvAlpha, 1, from_to, 3);

Mat cvBackgroundCopy;
Mat cvSourceCopy;
cvtColor(cvSource, cvSourceCopy, CV_RGBA2RGB);
cvtColor(cvBackground, cvBackgroundCopy, CV_RGBA2RGB);

// A = cvSource.rgb * cvBackground.rgb * cvSource.a
Mat cvBlendResultLeft;
multiply(cvSourceCopy, cvBackgroundCopy, cvBlendResultLeft, 1.0 / 255.0);
multiply(cvBlendResultLeft, cvAlpha, cvBlendResultLeft, 1.0 / 255.0);
delete(cvSourceCopy);

// invert alpha
bitwise_not(cvAlpha, cvAlpha);

// B = cvBackground.rgb * (1-cvSource.a)
Mat cvBlendResultRight;
multiply(cvBackgroundCopy, cvAlpha, cvBlendResultRight, 1.0 / 255.0);
delete(cvBackgroundCopy, cvAlpha);

// A + B
Mat cvBlendResult;
add(cvBlendResultLeft, cvBlendResultRight, cvBlendResult);
delete(cvBlendResultLeft, cvBlendResultRight);

cvtColor(cvBlendResult, cvBlendResult, CV_RGB2RGBA);

return cvBlendResult;
}

(Edit)

Here is an OpenCV solution based the source code of GIMP, specifically the function gimp_operation_multiply_mode_process_pixels.

NOTE

Instead of looping on all pixels it can be vectorized, but I followed the steps of GIMP.
Input images must be of type CV_8UC3 or CV_8UC4.
it supports also the opacity value, that must be in [0, 255]
in the original GIMP implementation there is also the support for a mask. It can be trivially added to the code, eventually.
This implementation is in fact not symmetrical, and reproduce your strange behaviour.

Code:

#include <opencv2opencv.hpp>
using namespace cv;

Mat blend_multiply(const Mat& level1, const Mat& level2, uchar opacity)
{
    CV_Assert(level1.size() == level2.size());
    CV_Assert(level1.type() == level2.type());
    CV_Assert(level1.channels() == level2.channels());

    // Get 4 channel float images
    Mat4f src1, src2;

    if (level1.channels() == 3)
    {
        Mat4b tmp1, tmp2;
        cvtColor(level1, tmp1, COLOR_BGR2BGRA);
        cvtColor(level2, tmp2, COLOR_BGR2BGRA);
        tmp1.convertTo(src1, CV_32F, 1. / 255.);
        tmp2.convertTo(src2, CV_32F, 1. / 255.);
    }
    else
    {
        level1.convertTo(src1, CV_32F, 1. / 255.);
        level2.convertTo(src2, CV_32F, 1. / 255.);
    }

    Mat4f dst(src1.rows, src1.cols, Vec4f(0., 0., 0., 0.));

    // Loop on every pixel

    float fopacity = opacity / 255.f;
    float comp_alpha, new_alpha;

    for (int r = 0; r < src1.rows; ++r)
    {
        for (int c = 0; c < src2.cols; ++c)
        {
            const Vec4f& v1 = src1(r, c);
            const Vec4f& v2 = src2(r, c);
            Vec4f& out = dst(r, c);

            comp_alpha = min(v1[3], v2[3]) * fopacity;
            new_alpha = v1[3] + (1.f - v1[3]) * comp_alpha;

            if ((comp_alpha > 0.) && (new_alpha > 0.))
            {
                float ratio = comp_alpha / new_alpha;

                out[0] = max(0.f, min(v1[0] * v2[0], 1.f)) * ratio + (v1[0] * (1.f - ratio));
                out[1] = max(0.f, min(v1[1] * v2[1], 1.f)) * ratio + (v1[1] * (1.f - ratio));
                out[2] = max(0.f, min(v1[2] * v2[2], 1.f)) * ratio + (v1[2] * (1.f - ratio));
            }
            else
            {
                out[0] = v1[0];
                out[1] = v1[1];
                out[2] = v1[2];
            }

            out[3] = v1[3];

        }
    }

    Mat3b dst3b;
    Mat4b dst4b;
    dst.convertTo(dst4b, CV_8U, 255.);
    cvtColor(dst4b, dst3b, COLOR_BGRA2BGR);

    return dst3b;
}

int main()
{
    Mat3b layer1 = imread("path_to_image_1");
    Mat3b layer2 = imread("path_to_image_2");

    Mat blend = blend_multiply(layer1, layer2, 255);

    return 0;
}

Please signup or login to give your own answer.

Click here to cancel reply.